Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-04-25 03:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #3034 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3034 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Anyway, I'm not sure how I'd answer that. I'm arguing with Herpy's interpretation of Philstar's words, and can see both sides of the argument Philstar's making. If I had to give an answer right now, though, to go on a bit of a tangent - that specific issue isn't misandry, no. It's not an attitude that applies to men in general; it's tearing down specific men who don't fit the paradigm of what a man "should be". It's definitely harmful and bad and a result of gender role crap, but I do not think I'd call it misandry, specifically.