case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-26 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3035 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3035 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
aboutelle: Evidence box marked "closed" (Default)

Re: Fandom Etiquette

[personal profile] aboutelle 2015-04-26 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Why would you assume this?

I assume that because I've seen enough arguments that started with someone responding to one of those posts. Usually it goes like this:

A: "Char is such a bitch. I wish she would die already."
B: *in an offended tone* "Why do you think that?"
A: "Numbered list of things Char has done wrong; and also why are you responding to my post. Free speech etc."
B: "Numbered counter-arguments; and also free speech doesn't mean you're not wrong, because you are, personal insult."
*rapid descent into more personal insults that somehow ends with both parties thinking they're being the reasonable one*

I don't think the general tag should be reserved for positive comments only. There's a middle ground between uncritical love ("This character is perfect and can do no wrong") and hate ("She's a slut and needs to die.") I actually think you could have a very interesting discussion about how one character I often see referred to as a slut seems to view sex as a currency. I just really don't think that someone who calls her a slut and wishes for her death is looking to have that discussion.

Re: Fandom Etiquette

(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough.

I didn't realize initially, upon reading your post, that you were referring ONLY to people who post insulting comments when saying they weren't looking for a discussion. (I initially thought you meant that people who write anything negative weren't looking for discussion).

I agree that people who write "so and so is a useless bitch" are 99% of the time not looking for constructive commentary. And I do think that they should, as a matter of courtesy, try to post that more in hate-specific tags. But I also don't really think it's something fandom should jump down their throat for either (unless they put it in a positive tag -- then that's fair).