Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-04-26 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3035 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3035 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Being Pro-Censorship
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)They've closed off one specific means of accessing the book. That's not at all the same as banning it. There's a plethora of ways to find it and no punishment or bar from doing so.
Like, seriously:
When a school specifically decides not to a put a certain book in their library... "banned" is the appropriate word
by this argument, it would follow that every school has banned the vast majority of books published in human history
Re: Being Pro-Censorship
Like if I decide to donate King & King, Heather Has Two Mommies and And Tango Makes Three to my local elementary school, and they refuse those books because they're not allowed in the school library, than those books are banned from the school library. It's not just that some librarian decided to buy The Velveteen Rabbit instead.
And in that example, it's a pretty good indication that the elementary school is banning LGBT-positive books from the school's library.
Re: Being Pro-Censorship
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Second, it's accurate to say that they're not allowed in the school library. I don't think it's accurate to say that the book is banned, because it's not banned. It's not blocked, proscribed, or punished. It's not prohibited and reading it isn't punished. It's removed from this one specific system and place. That's not a good thing, but it's not the same as saying it's banned.
I can tell this is about to become an argument about the precise definition of the word "banned", though. So if you want to just say that this is what "banned" means to you, fine, whatever. That's not what I think it means, and I think it's insanely overdramatic to use in this context, but fuck it, whatever.
Re: Being Pro-Censorship
Not from me. I'm not invested enough for that.
It's not prohibited and reading it isn't punished
You're assuming that. I have been told by teachers "don't bring that book back to school with you" about books I brought into the school from the public library. Schools do feel that they have a right to meddle in what students are reading in their free time (like on lunch break or after assignments are finished).