[ SECRET POST #3037 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3037 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: about ableism

[(Anonymous)]

That gets into ADA territory - the customer has to tell the bartender that they have a disability that is making them appear drunk, and then the bartender can serve them. It's not something the bartender has to guess.

Re: about ableism

[(Anonymous)]

OK, but that doesn't really seem to fit well with the understanding of ableism that the starter of this thread is advancing

Re: about ableism

[(Anonymous)]

Well, that's what the ADA is meant to do - give people who are being treated in an ableist way some recourse. Ideally, people would recognise the difference between CP and drunk but in real life most people don't meet a lot of people with CP and do meet a lot of drunks, so ableist assumptions are made. I suppose the realistic version would be for people not to assume either way but to observe/inquire further.

Re: about ableism

[(Anonymous)]

DA

It's not exactly realistic to expect that someone is going to be able to observe/enquire further in every situation. Some, such as where the physical well-being of all or either party/parties involved is at stake, are going to be an 'assume first, ask later' situation.