case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-30 06:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #3039 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3039 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Starsky and Hutch]


__________________________________________________



03.
(legend of Zelda)


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.
[Ernest Hemingway (and his cat)]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-30 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, to be fair most of it would fall under those categories, so someone unfamiliar with the scope and conventions of fandom could be forgiven for thinking that way.

For every one meta or critical analysis I see, I see dozens and dozens of fanart or fanfic, for example.
elaminator: (Rat Queens: Dee (eyebrow raise))

[personal profile] elaminator 2015-04-30 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Yea, I do think that's the way it works for a lot of fandoms...at least the larger ones. I imagine there are smaller fandoms where it might be easier to find discussion or meta than a treasure trove of fic or art, but (in my experience) those seem few and far between.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2015-05-01 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
I suspect there's a lot of sampling bias going on. For every fanfic author, how many people post comments? For every person who posts comments, how many people just read? For everyone who reads fanfic, how many are tuning into the show every week and talking about it in the staff kitchen?

Just to estimate the numbers, Orphan Black has been clocking 500,000 consistently just on BBC America. There's a bit less than 2,000 stories tagged in the fandom on AO3. That's 250 estimated regular viewers for every story.
Edited 2015-05-01 00:14 (UTC)
elaminator: (Default)

[personal profile] elaminator 2015-05-01 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
You have a point. I guess it also depends on what you consider fandom to be, because not everyone agrees on the definition.

Maybe it would be more accurate to specify 'online' fandom as being heavy on the shipping, but again, there's not any way to know just how many people consider themselves to be in fandom and what exactly they get up to.

Hmm, that's pretty interesting. Now I'm curious as to how other fandoms measure up with their viewers/fic ratios.
Edited 2015-05-01 00:20 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2015-05-01 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'd actually have put fanfic readers under the same umbrella as fanfic writers.

Whether you write or consume fanfic (or fanart) then that's still a major aspect of fandom involvement for you, and it still comes under the criteria OP talks about. I didn't take their secret to be simply about the people creating fanworks (because how can you 'create' a sex fantasy in that respect? You can have a fandom related sex fantasy that you never talk about and still consider yourself part of the fandom) but those who seek them out and consume them too.