[ SECRET POST #3041 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[lb_lee]

You know, that actually kinda honks me off, and I've had more than enough dealings with actual rapists of children and folks who defend them.

Like, what? How would removing Lolita from TVtropes help anything? I don't even get how people can READ that book and think it supports raping kids. Just... BUH? *headsplode*

--Rogan

[feotakahari]

"I don't even get how people can READ that book and think it supports raping kids."

I remember you telling me about academic essayists who were convinced the story was about a little girl seducing and ruining a grown man.

As for why it was removed, I think Fast Eddie had some sort of personal history. At one point, someone posted that they didn't have a problem with drawings of naked children, since no actual children were pictured. Fast Eddie responded with a hypothetical about someone uploading a drawing of your naked daughter, then claiming it wasn't your daughter, it was a drawing of a two thousand year old wizard who just looked like a child. Everyone else pretty much went "What?"

[lb_lee]

*sigh* Yes. I'd almost finished purging that crap from my brain too... at least it proves that academic loftiness doesn't mean you have SENSE.

Ahhhh, yeah, that definitely sounds personal. Still, eesh.

--Rogan