case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3041 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
The only thing you could have done correctly is cater to this one anon. Seriously. All their braying about Teh Community is BS.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously, they just seem extremely butthurt that their trolling and other bullshit has been deleted or frozen.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
It wasn't just one anon. I wasn't happy with the ruling either and it's still frustrating that case is selective about what qualifies as a spoiler without explaining his reasoning.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
I can get not being happy about the ruling, but he's asking what he could have done differently in terms of asking the community what it wanted. And the only thing he could have done differently that would've pleased that anon, based on the other things they're saying, is not ask the community at all.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Anons. Not pleased one anon. Pleased the more than one anon. Please stop with this all anon are one anon petty bullshit.

Case should delete posts that imply or claim that.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Bullshit, you saw the option for more control and took it. You always make up your mind before running a vote, and interpret the results to support that decision anyway. Now come on, all anon or all logged in. Put it to a vote. No third way, show us you have at least that shred of honor and stick to that principle. Already you try to weasel out of it. You shame yourself and your family with that. Vote on all anon or all logged, now, or admit you just want to run your own little kingdom.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
But what about people who like it mixed

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
We don't count, apparently.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
We don't matter. Only ayrt matters.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
Case has admitted they cannot enforce that responsibly and impartially. Case has taken that off the table by admitting they have a problem with the status quo. So now we ought to vote on which alternative it ought to be. All logged in or all anon.
blitzwing: ([magi] aladdin)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-05-03 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
I bet I know what you really want nonny. I bet you want mixed, with IP logging on. Sounds up your alley.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
He'd be able to enforce it reasonably and impartially then!

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
DA

That's actually what I want. At least for a while. I want to find out if that anon is a stirrer who got butthurt when case deleted/froze their shit. Because it sure does sound like it.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
As long as it logs named users too. The logging anon only is just punitive to people who value privacy. And now case will abuse be poured on anons who actually do value privacy and will tacitly endorse the mockery.
blitzwing: ([magi] Jafar)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-05-03 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't bother me any for my IP to be logged (to be honest, I assumed it already was logged for named users).

The logging anon only is just punitive to people who value privacy.

How does it violate privacy? Because then Case can tell anons from each other and it kind of turns them into named users for him?
Edited 2015-05-03 00:57 (UTC)

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
Named users going anon to try to keep the same old system are incredibly obvious. That is why it needs to go. It is exploiting bug to silence others.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
This is basically the exact same thing as "all anons who disagree with me are the same person."
blitzwing: ([magi] aladdin)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-05-03 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Don't forget the lurkers that support them in email.

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2015-05-03 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2015-05-03 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
So you are a coward and have no honor. When faced with a real decision you fold. Your grandmother must be ashamed of you.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Dude are you trying to use Asian stereotypes against him?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] othellia - 2015-05-03 07:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 03:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 18:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2015-05-04 06:53 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
Are you a Klingon?

Do we have a Klingon anon here?