Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3041 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I'd always thought that was a given - everyone has the option to go anon (and take the "can't be recognized" merit in exchange for the "can't be recognized" flaw) or make an account (it takes 5 minutes) and those that go one way are opting to go that way. No one is forcing you to stay anon!
Regarding the spoiler thing, I had no stance on it, so I'm not really sure what egos have to do with that. I went with what most people voted for, and that was for the spoiler rule. Could you specify what I could have done correctly or incorrect there, besides maybe a counting mistake (but if I recall correctly there was a significant difference, like 6-8 votes)?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)Case should delete posts that imply or claim that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:43 am (UTC)(link)That's actually what I want. At least for a while. I want to find out if that anon is a stirrer who got butthurt when case deleted/froze their shit. Because it sure does sound like it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
The logging anon only is just punitive to people who value privacy.
How does it violate privacy? Because then Case can tell anons from each other and it kind of turns them into named users for him?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:10 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:46 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 00:58 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) (no subject)
no subject
I really don't see a reason a poll is necessary for all anon or all logged in (or why we have to move that way at all), or why the third option needs to be ignored there (as this is not as simple as 'yes spoilers' or 'no spoilers'). Like I said, if you would like to give up the merit of "cannot be recognized" in order to drop the flaw of "cannot be recognized" you're free to do so.
And I guess I can tell you as many times as you like that control has nothing to do with it but if you don't believe me then that's that, so I'll stop repeating myself now.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:55 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(My grandmother was super fundie Christian so this would be pretty minor on her list of grievances, I think. I didn't really know her very well.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 01:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 03:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-03 18:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-04 06:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 08:44 am (UTC)(link)Do we have a Klingon anon here?