case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3041 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
The worst part is when a logged in user makes a comment, then there are three or four comments immediately after them with the exact same syntax agreeing. Logged in users abuse the hell out of the anon system to make it look like they have more support than they do.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
Well, to be fair, anyone can abuse the anon system that way, anons or logged in users alike.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
But only real anons get accused of it. No one ever is allowed to point out when a named user is doing it, because you just get a load of abuse and called jelly or wanting to get your way. Yet when a named user throws accusations around, then it gets treated like serious business regardless of how obvious it is they are spouting bullshit.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
I never said it was fair, just that it was possible.

I'd be happy with this comm going all-logged-in for that very reason. It's not that hard to make a sock account. But then again, it's not that hard to make SEVERAL sock accounts either.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
SA

Or to clarify I never said the practice was fair. The ability to use it is fair game, though.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
How do you know it's "real" anons getting accused of it? Any of the anons accused of that stuff could be named users who are signed out.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
That happens with anon comments sometimes too, though?