case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-10 03:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #3049 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: lol no, sorry

(Anonymous) 2015-05-10 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
How does randomly picking someone who doesn't have children, just assuming they hold a childfree philosophy, and then getting upset when they don't live up to that at all fucking helpful in "getting support?"
sidewinder: (Default)

Re: lol no, sorry

[personal profile] sidewinder 2015-05-11 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
This.

Because it's also making an assumption that a person has chosen to be childfree - a perfect valid choice to make, yes - when maybe they are childless not by choice (*raises hand*) or just aren't in the place to make that decision/commitment yet.

Placing expectations on others and their reproductive choices is never a good thing. Do what you want, commit to what you want, and don't judge others or decide that someone has "betrayed" you if their choice eventually isn't what you would have chosen.