case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #3053 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (mutts: little pink sock)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2015-05-15 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
I cannot for the life of me understand the logic behind deciding that the best way to convince people that some guy is undeservedly celebrated and beloved is to hurl hate and threats at him. Isn't it, like, blindingly obvious that doing that will only make the guy's stans 500% LESS likely to give the critics the benefit of the doubt and think they may have a valid point?
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2015-05-15 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
They don't think people *can* change their mind; current fandom logic thinks that people are either good or bad full stop.