[ SECRET POST #3053 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

It's the hill with equality. And titties.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

You're not making a very good case for womens' chests being nonsexual with the glee you're showing about being able to see "titties"

Equality is not on us as viewers to desexualize womens' chests; it's on the creators of the content to display womens' chests in a nonsexual manner equal to mens' chests, which neither the OP nor the creator of the original canon that OP is showing an image from, has done.

Are all images of womens' chests sexual? No.
Is this one? Yes.

I know you hate to admit you're wrong, but have you seen the movie that is being referenced? The scene in the image is intended to be sexual so your arguments about how this particular image is not sexual, have 0 ground here

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

have you seen the movie that is being referenced? The scene in the image is intended to be sexual so your arguments about how this particular image is not sexual, have 0 ground here

I have not seen the movie in question (no clue what movie it is) but the image itself is not sexual. It has to be watched in a movie, in context, for it to be sexual. "it's sexual in context, so block it!" it not a very practical cry. Feet, hair, necks, stomachs, can be sexual in context, but they don't get banned from sight.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

You can't seriously be that stupid.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Nah. If female's boob being desexualized, the only thing that kept male sexual drive moving is baby making.

Either that or we all became zombies.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Quote
Are all images of womens' chests sexual? No.
Is this one? Yes.

damn you stupid fuck.