case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #3053 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
I hate to say this because I loathe the SPs but that kind of thinking is what set them off. Yes, they are overreacting to the nth degree but, while I totally understand liking something in part because of liking the not-cis-straight-white-maleness involved (I'm openly excited for Star Wars VII because the hero is black!), we should celebrate good SF for what makes the work truly good and unique. Women can still write bad books ("Save the Pearls" anyone?) and a character's race doesn't automatically make them more interesting. APPEALING, perhaps, but a crappily written character will make you hate how they represent a group, with or even without racist undertones. Diversity is important and should be promoted but quality MUST come first.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
nyart

Which is probably why they mentioned it's "wonderful and deserving of all the awards" first. Anon isn't suggesting we submit shitty work just for the sake for diversity, they're hoping that it wins because it's good AND would piss off the SPs.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-16 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I would sort of argue that a lack of diversity is an inherently shitty way to write. I mean women are over 50% of the population, what kind of terrible Deus Ex Machina plotholes do you have to come up with to exclude them? Except those plotholes are so common we've learned to shrug and overlook them, even though they're inherently bad writing.