[ SECRET POST #3058 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Ughhhhh

[(Anonymous)]

As an anon above said, you are are making an ethical objection to something in his content, not at all talking about his writing itself. In fact, it's not even about the content, it sounds like it's the superficial outline. It's one thing to say "I don't understand why character A has fallen in love with character B" or "I'm having trouble seeing the chemistry" but you're just saying "I object to this so there!"

I'm not saying you're wrong - I'd also be a bit wary of a fifty-something guy dating a twenty-something woman. But you know what, they are both adults. That twenty-two year old woman is an adult, not a vulnerable child. If the story contained a 16 year old child, then yeah, I might be compelled to mention something too, but really your "critique" doesn't sound helpful at all. Even if it is 50-something-year-old wish fulfillment romance, so what? There's nothing inherently wrong with that.