[ SECRET POST #3060 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3060 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: DC Comics

[(Anonymous)]

How so?

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Because there is no way in hell Lois Lane would reveal to the world that Clark and Superman are one and the same.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

na

wait what? what the fuuuuuck

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

http://observationdeck.io9.com/lois-lane-to-out-superman-1700222604

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Nothing happening

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously?

Then again, didn't he cheat on her with Wonder Woman?

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

http://observationdeck.io9.com/lois-lane-to-out-superman-1700222604

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Try posting a link that actually works.

http://kotaku.com/superman-and-lois-lane-probably-aren-t-friends-anymore-1701717016

It remains to be seen where DC goes with this... I thought outing Grayson was an interesting choice and so far it's borne fruit, but outing Supes? I wouldn't be surprised if this saw a cosmic retcon a few years down the road.

Then again, maybe not. I think DC is purposely trying to shake things up a bit, which can be a risky strategy in an industry and a fandom that is hostile to change.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Still wish they wouldn't destroy Lois Lane to do it.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Nobody's destroying Lois Lane. She's always been a dogged reporter. That's who she is. If she has no vested interest in keeping Supes' identity private, then of course she's going to do her job.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

I will destroy Lois Lane.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Nobody asked you, Dan Didio.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Clark and Lois aren't together in the post-Flashpoint/New 52 continuity and never were.

The Superman/Wondy relationship has been pretty cute so far, though, except in the hands of incompetent writers which has been blessedly rare.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

You think the DC Comicsverse is trying to be like the MCU where secret identities aren't really a much of a thing there?

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Slight misfire, my post meant to go to the one you had above with the link, but the question still stands.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

All good!

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Considering that Marvel and DC have been borrowing ideas from each other for decades, yeah, that's a good possibility.

I do feel like the move to LA has been good for DC -- most of their lineup has been consistently good since Forever Evil. Convergence has been a disappointment, though.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Omg yes. I've been liking some of their output lately (mainly Grayson, tbh, though I'm excited for the new Midnighter series), but this is so stupid. Why they keep insisting on pushing Lois and Clark apart, I have no idea.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Because of that stupid DC Edict that no couple can ever live happily ever after. Never.