[ SECRET POST #3062 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[herpymcderp]

That could also be true. I never followed DS9, but I wouldn't put it past that production team.

I think there's something to be said for it, but I don't think most people would be interested in watching an entire film shot in that manner unless it was an arthouse type of thing.

[quantumreality]

Yeah. A lot of people don't realize how labor-intensive shit could be even as late as the 1970s, simply because of the lack of desktop computers. What today can be done with a digital camera and a good proprietary animation studio software package had to be done back then with manual cutting and pasting and careful editing.

It's honestly probably easier to just use the sepia or B&W effect of a software package than to get that extra 10% or 5% realism by using period film stock and developing methods.