case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-30 04:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #3069 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3069 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2015-05-30 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Ehhhh. I was trying not to come across as "objectify men!" More, "men have sexual agency while women don't and that's fucking bullshit." In this case, I'm not going for the eye for an eye, objectify as they do, but a reclaiming of women's sexuality by actively enjoying those are basically presented for our pleasure. Which, really, has its own issues that are too big for me to get down to in this post. Little things, I suppose.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] iceyred 2015-05-30 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
See, I'm not thinking too hard about this. They can objectify me, and I'll happily objectify them right back. Everybody wins.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2015-05-30 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Haha, I'm down with, tbh.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] iceyred 2015-05-30 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
This might be relevant to your interests then. It was relevant to mine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ck8oBcOUBg&feature=youtu.be
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2015-05-30 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
oh yes, girl. i was all over that when it happened. i even wrote terrible fic for it. lol. (and i had a weird randy orton foot fetish dream last night too.)
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] iceyred 2015-05-30 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a good scene to inspire a fanfic or five. It's kinky as all get out.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: OMG NO

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2015-05-30 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah. i'm disappointed no one else wrote fic for it, but i seem to be the one in the fandom that writes the things people want to read, but just don't write?