case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-03 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #3073 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3073 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Master Chef]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Raven Cycle by Maggie Stiefvater]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Frank]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Discworld]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Baccano!]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Cher Lloyd/Kingsman: The Secret Service]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Eurovision]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Hannah Rutherford (Yogscast)]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Of these particular questions:

Green: Prejudice. Everyone conveniently forgets about the ones that don't fit -- or they must have been "really Slytherins".

Blue: Hogwarts is a terrible school with no humanities and minimal social sciences, yes, that is correct. I figure they must do a lot of on-the-job training.

Red: There are also multiple professional teams and who knows how many amateur leagues? This one's just shortsighted.

Yellow: Inbreeding doesn't wipe people out that reliably, especially if they have good medicine. Anyway, they're free to rewrite history and retroactively declare people pureblood if they feel like it.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Yellow: Rowling says they work on Nazi race laws for pureblood anyway. As long as your grandparents were wizards, you are pureblood even if your great grandparents were Muggles. So there is a flow of newblood, it is just slow. The "ancient" families are inbred to a certain degree because they are purer than pure bloods, but as long as they were careful to manage the stock books, they could probably keep any marriages to no worse than first cousin (which is legal in most of Europe) level. Plus there is no reason to say that pureblood mamas didn't step out with some filthy muggles for a bit of rough (leaving an obliviate or confundus behind with the muggle) and come back with a baby every so often. Hell, regular aristos did that so often that most people accept that one of the main Princes of Britain is illegitimate.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I love that Harry is so obviously not Prince Charles' bio kid, but nobody seems to care. He's still Charles' son and Wills' brother.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Erm, no, have you not noticed how much he looks like his grandpa on his dad's side?

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
Oh good Lord. Hewitt himself says that he and Diana didn't meet until after Harry was born. And Harry SCREAMS Windsor, with that nose/eye combination. The red hair he gets from his Spencer relatives (2 of Diana's 3 siblings are gingers). Please stop promoting your fantasies as fact.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Calm down Philip, calm down.

op

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Oh! I wasn't aware of that! That makes a lot of sense. Still, all it would take is one terrible event to decimate the gene pool. After two wars, the entire legacy of two powerful, ancient houses is Draco Malfoy.
raspberryrain: (Default)

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2015-06-04 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
More on yellow: You can sustain a population on a few hundred individuals for a really long time. There's not that much advantage to exogamy, and it can even be dangerous due to exposure to new STD's and mutations that didn't happen in your own population.

Also, the Weasleys definitely demonstrate that the Wizarding subculture is capable of rebuilding its population after a plague or something.

I don't think "bred to extinction" is a serious risk.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't know about that. That's interesting.
raspberryrain: (raised eyebrow)

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2015-06-04 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Well, there is some risk, if a mutation happens. Look at Florida panthers (a very low-population subsubspecies of puma concolor). The present-day purebreds (as opposed to those hybridised with other pumas) all have the same visible mutation: a kink in the tail.

It could be bad. But then again, this is a society of magic-users, and they might be able to use arcane technology to avoid some of the problems.

A few hundred individuals, or even better a few thousand, can in theory manage all right for some centuries, long enough for social ideas about "purity" to go in and out of fashion a few times. Over time, they will start to look alike, and the risks increase, but so does the likelihood that new mores evolve in response to those risks.

How many Sentinelese are there? Maybe 300? They've been separated from the rest of humanity for a really long time, and they don't engage with outsiders at present.

The wizarding world is far larger, and far more likely to interbreed anyway.

Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but I figure the wizarding world probably at least has some few millions worldwide, and even in the British Isles enough population to keep going indefinitely.

op

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't mean catastrophic failure of the bloodline, I meant bred to extinction. They aren't the same thing.

If you don't want to read far too much about ducks, skip this.

The real world example I compare it to is New Zealand's Grey duck. For centuries there were only two species there, the Grey and the Paradise. Then the Mallard was introduced. The Mallard duck is bigger, stronger, and more aggressive than the Grey. As a result, Mallard drakes are winning fights against Grey drakes, and as such are breeding more frequently and with Grey ducks. Therefore, pureblood Greys are critically endangered, even though they're not being killed off by anything or inbreeding in a way that could damage the gene pool.

Further compounding this is the fact that Mallards are also capable of breeding with the Paradise ducks. There is concern that the introduction of the mallard may cause the two species, which had coexisted for centuries in their own specific niches, to eventually become one mixed type of joint Paradise/Mallard/Grey parentage.

That's how I see it happening in-universe. Not with all purebloods having dangerous genes, but with outside breeding competition infiltrating the bloodlines. Every Andromeda Black causes not only the loss of her and her offspring to the breeding pool, but also puts further pressure on the remaining purebloods by increasing the competition for mates. This is especially true for wizards, because the purebloods have a fixed number of bloodlines, while the muggleborns draw from outside sources every year.
raspberryrain: (Default)

Re: op

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2015-06-04 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
OK, I misunderstood what you meant.

Well, there are real-world tribes that marry entirely in the tribe. I don't think it's completely infeasible.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
That's okay. I should have been more clear. It isn't really a common concept, because it requires a contained ecosystem to suddenly have outside breeding competition.

That's a good point, but I think Hogwarts itself would be a stumbling block there. Wizarding children spend their most hormonal formative years separated from the parents with that belief system, and instead mingling with muggle-born peers.

You're smart. I like debating with you. This is fun. You make me consider new viewpoints and teach me new things. Thanks!
raspberryrain: (funky)

Thinking more about this:

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2015-06-04 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose the Mallards had some natural advantages for various reasons. But what if the Greys were magic-users, and both intelligent enough and prejudiced enough to choose to stay with their own kind?

If there's no genetic advantage to being a pureblood, eventually the 'purebloods' will be the 'somewhat purer-bloods,' as more 'less pure blood' percolates through. This happens to real-world human populations too.

But if there is a genetic advantage, or even a strong social advantage, to being a pureblood, then purebloods will tend to marry purebloods for that reason.

And human beings are capable of reproducing far above replacement rate, come to that.

Surely JKR was modelling the purebloods on aristocratic populations that marry other aristocrats for various reasons, or wealthy sorts who marry other wealthy sorts to keep the money in the family. It's a recognisable phenomenon. I suppose if you're trying to make sure all your children inherit magic powers, you have even more incentive to marry within proven magic-user bloodlines.