[ SECRET POST #3074 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3074 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

You're right, it makes no sense.

[raspberryrain]

It was a visual conceit for a visual medium, like so much of the goofier stuff committed to film.

Re: You're right, it makes no sense.

[(Anonymous)]

Except other people have explained exactly how it makes sense.

my point was...

[raspberryrain]

The restriction on only flesh-coated stuff making it back really only makes "movie" sense, not actual scientific sense. It's an artistic conceit, for the sake of naked Arnold Schwarzenegger, not based on anything scientific.