Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-06-05 06:30 pm
[ SECRET POST #3075 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3075 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Spy]
__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Eurovision]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Captain America]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILERS for Age of Ultron]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Harry Potter, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and DragonFable]

__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for sexual abuse]

(Duggar Family, 19 kids & Counting)
__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for incest]

[A Redtail's Dream]
__________________________________________________
19. [WARNING for rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Whether or not those arguments are a good thing to take part in IDK
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)It's just frustrating to me when I say that I'm uncomfortable with Sharon/Peggy, I've literally had people tell me there's no reason for me to feel this way because Peggy supports them together and wouldn't want Steve to be sad and alone.
Which is annoying because while I'm sure Peggy wants Steve to be happy, that doesn't necessarily mean she'd approve of Sharon/Steve (she might, of course, but we don't know either way).
And so Hayley's tweets are nice because it's a real easy way for me to say, "Hey, not approving of Steve/Sharon isn't just MY issue. Peggy's actress herself doesn't approve."
I just get tired of people telling me that Peggy would be okay with it. There's no evidence either way in canon.
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-06 01:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)actually, they're making an incredibly reasonably argument
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-06 12:29 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-06 12:53 am (UTC)(link)lol @ you
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-06 11:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)But when I say that I don't want Sharon/Steve to be canon because it makes me uncomfortable, I've had people tell me that Peggy would approve.
But the thing is, we just don't know.
And while Hayley isn't Peggy (obviously), having her say she doesn't approve helps me to point out that it's not just ME that has an issue with it. It's not my particular hangup.
And that people shouldn't just presume that Peggy would be okay with it when she might not be.
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)It's about the fact that when I've expressed discomfort with the idea of Sharon/Steve being canon, I've repeatedly had people tell me that Peggy would approve. And we don't know either way.
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-05 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)The thing is, Peggy MIGHT disapprove for similar reasons to me (she might not be okay with Steve dating one of her relatives). Or she might be 100% happy for them. We don't know.
I just get tired of being told that OF COURSE she'd be fine with it. We don't know either way.
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
But that's a matter of bad taste, not a violation of some nonexistent objective standard of what a Peggy Carter is.
Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-06 12:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP - NOTE OF CLARIFICATION
(Anonymous) 2015-06-06 11:50 am (UTC)(link)