Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-06-07 03:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3077 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3077 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Lackadaisy Cats]
__________________________________________________
03.

(Gorillaz)
__________________________________________________
04.

(Tripping over you)
__________________________________________________
05.

[Stitchers]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Dragon Age]
__________________________________________________
07.

[The Mighty Boosh]
__________________________________________________
08.

[LOVE LIVE!]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Brooklyn 99]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Mad Max Fury Road]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Maggie Stiefvater]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Emily Alice Ovenden]
__________________________________________________
13.

[When Marnie Was There/Omoide no Marnie]
__________________________________________________
14.

(Rick and Morty)
__________________________________________________
15.

[Suppression]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Wall-e]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Ancillary Justice & Ancillary Sword]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #440.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: How about popular opinions?
(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)To the first paragraph: I don't think that any of those points are really ill-taken and I don't see how they're failing to address the fundamental problem of death. It seems to me that they would largely agree that People Die When They Are Killed, and are basically challenging how we should understand "people" and "die". And, although most of the time that's not at all a meaningful distinction, it is relevant in this specific hypothetical - because I think the hypothetical existence of this teleporter changes what are the relevant facts of the situation. I don't think the conclusion that they reach is necessarily wrong, either.
To the second paragraph: I'm not familiar with Ryle's thought (although perhaps I should be more so!). But:
suppose you were to undergo immensely painful therapy with no anesthetic. In its place, you would have a drug that completely paralyzes you (preventing you from outwardly showing a pain response) and a drug that prevents you from forming new memories (so you would be unable to recall the experience afterwards.) if you agree with Ryle's ideas, you should have no problem agreeing to the surgery.
I can honestly say that I would have no problem undergoing the surgery given those conditions (provided it was reasonable to take it as undoubtable fact that, you know, all of these things work as described and are risk-free and all that kind of thing). And in fact that conclusion seems pretty much intuitively right.
Re: How about popular opinions?
Re: How about popular opinions?
(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: How about popular opinions?