case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-16 05:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3086 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3086 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.











Notes:

Bit early, sorry!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #441.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: TW Rape

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-06-16 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It's more like theft.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, theft of services.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: TW Rape

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-06-16 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. You had a vocal agreement. She/he delivered on the service. You took the service without paying.

Theft.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes but that service was consenting sex. The consent was dependant on the payment. without the payment the consent is withdrawn. no consent = rape.

Situational consent, and consent being withdrawn after the fact both have president in the charge of "Rape by deception"

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Consent being withdrawn after the fact?!

Where has all the common sense gone? Oh, what a world, what a world.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
MRA Detected.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Those MRA detectors are as accurate as Gaydar.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Fuck off. Around my part of the world if a man lies to a woman to get her to sleep with him, he is a rapist both morally and legally. This is an example of consent being dependant on the situation, and being withdrawn after the fact if the party was deceived. How else would you propose protecting these women how are lied to and used?

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
There's no such thing as consent withdrawn after the sex. You can withdraw before or during, but not after.

Go back to Tumblr and never come back, please.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
But there is if the sex is dependent upon payment for said sex.

Re: TW Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Around my part of the world, your argument would have worked better if you'd left the genders neutral.