[ SECRET POST #3094 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3094 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #442.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP here

[dazzledfirestar]

It's worth noting too that we've got canon that Nick Fury was the one out there looking for those lost agents post-TWS (in Agents of SHIELD, he was listening to old SHIELD channels and heard Fitz and Simmons' distress call. It's an easy jump to assume they were not the first or last he saved). Steve demanded the system be torn down but he never actually plans for what comes next.

In the comics he does get called on that but the lesson never really sticks.

Re: OP here

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't know that about Fury in AoS. Good on him. Maybe that was the shade behind "Looks like you're giving the orders now, Captain." Unspoken was, "Even if they're stupid-ass ones."

Re: OP here

[dazzledfirestar]

lol I got that sense from that comment too. I think it boils down to Steve being very reactionary--this happened so now we have to blow this shit up regardless of any other factors, verse Nick who clearly put time and energy even before things went to hell to figure out who was behind the problems and what to do about it and how to handle the fallout.

Two different styles that clash but are means to the same ends... at least that's how I see Nick and Steve in canon.

Re: OP here

[(Anonymous)]

I think you're right on, there.