case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-29 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3099 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I think that on a basic level, moral judgment is the faculty or process of balancing and choosing between competing moral imperatives in circumstances where not all can be achieved.

So, yes, I'd steal if I thought that, given the circumstances, it was the most moral course of action available to me.

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Imagine you have a choice between going hungry and stealing. What'd you do?

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
It would depend on the circumstances.

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
True that. What about Robin Hood and other "noble" thieves? Are they right or wrong?

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
It would depend on the circumstances.

Sorry, I'm being twee. But I generally don't think it's useful, or even coherent, to have these kinds of hypothetical moral debates absent specific details, because so much about whether or not it's moral depends on those details.

That said, I definitely don't think it's automatically immoral, and I tend to be more sympathetic to that kind of thing than not.