[ SECRET POST #3099 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

[(Anonymous)]

Imagine you have a choice between going hungry and stealing. What'd you do?

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

[(Anonymous)]

It would depend on the circumstances.

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

[(Anonymous)]

True that. What about Robin Hood and other "noble" thieves? Are they right or wrong?

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

[(Anonymous)]

It would depend on the circumstances.

Sorry, I'm being twee. But I generally don't think it's useful, or even coherent, to have these kinds of hypothetical moral debates absent specific details, because so much about whether or not it's moral depends on those details.

That said, I definitely don't think it's automatically immoral, and I tend to be more sympathetic to that kind of thing than not.