case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-30 06:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #3100 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3100 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Assassin's Creed Syndicate, Dishonored 2]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Gaia Online]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Brendon Urie, Panic! at the Disco (+P!nk, Teresa Marie)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Winona Ryder in Heathers]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Orphan Black]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Miraculous Ladybug]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Mentalist]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Legend]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Spy (2015)]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Bridget Marquardt, Girls Next Door]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Unpopular Opinions Thread

[personal profile] feotakahari 2015-06-30 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Death of the Author gives most authors more credit than they deserve.

First you've got the world, which is so complex that no one person can fully understand it. Then you've got the author's interpretation of the world (or a fantastical setting inspired by the world), which is based in their knowledge and experiences. Since they're just one person, each author's world is smaller than the real world, and doesn't address some factors another author might discuss.

If you're Dickens, you can write what you've seen even if you don't fully understand it. Death of the Author can bring out new ideas and address concepts that might not have even existed in your time, like how the abused girlfriend in Oliver Twist fits a modern conception of Battered Spouse Syndrome. But if you're Hawthorne, you just write your limited conception of what is and must be true, ignoring any possible point of contradiction. An analysis based on another viewpoint is difficult or even impossible, because the world elements that would allow for the existence of that viewpoint don't exist in the text.

To put it more starkly, you cannot take the racism out of Lovecraft. It just can't be done.
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Unpopular Opinions Thread

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2015-07-01 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
I just looked up Death of the Author on TV Tropes. I find it interesting there that it identifies JRR Tolkien as essentially supporting Death of the Author with his comments from the LotR preface about not intending to be allegorical, but believing in applicability instead.