case: ([ Otacon; Trust me. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-01-29 06:50 am

[ SECRET POST #389 ]


⌈ Secret Post #389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62.


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.


__________________________________________________



67.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 222 secrets from Secret Submission Post #056.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, [ 1 2 3 4 ] not!secret, [ 1 ] too big, [ 1 2 (yes, twice) ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 30th, 2008.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] falco-999.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
56. Twerp.

(Anonymous) 2008-01-30 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Lit Snob

[identity profile] falco-999.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I have nothing against sci-fi and fantasy, or against any of the genres. I love Pratchett and George Martin and genre detective fiction by the likes of P.D. James and Lindsey Davis. They're fine writers who know how to spin a good yarn, and they do it with a fair degree of skill and intelligence. But I'm not going to lie and say they're better than the classics. "Elite" is not always a bad word.
redseeker: (Alice)

[personal profile] redseeker 2008-01-30 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I think they have a point. I'm doing a joint degree in Eng. Lit. and Creative Writing, and I can't tell you how grateful I am that others in my CW group are interested in writing, say, teen fiction, or fantasy, or whatever. I can't stand those who go on about "cultural landmarks" and adopt a snobbish attitude to modern fiction. As my CW tutor said the other day, even genre fiction can be "literary" if it's good.
And I can't stand Dickens.

[identity profile] falco-999.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Genre fiction can be literary, certainly. And it's bloody hard to write a good genre novel. I can't even write good fanfiction. People in your class take writing genre seriously? Good for them. It should be. Though I think there's a cut off point, where good genre ceases to be genre and becomes good literature, having abandoned or subverted so many traits of the genre, having injected so much original material that it makes a blueprint of its own, it frees itself from generic constraints. For instance, the two defining works of 20th century fantasy are TLotR and the Gormenghast books. The former is not genre itself, but it founded a genre. The latter stand alone and hard to quantify.

The curt tone of my initial response was assumed because the OP sounds thick and boorish. Just because you don't like Dickens, and the OP doesn't like Austen, and I flee when confronted with Russian literature, which supposedly contains the greatest novels ever written, that still makes us asses if we try and belittle their achievement, or assume that because we are unable to appreciate them, their greatness must be a myth. They have a place in the literary canon for a reason. In a hundred years time, so much of what is popular now will be pulp in the lining of motorways. A few modern authors from literary and genre may have survived and still be read. Perhaps Pratchett will be a second Wodehouse. Most, however, will have joined Walter Scott or the run-away best seller Uncle Tom's Cabin in obscurity.
redseeker: (Alice)

[personal profile] redseeker 2008-01-30 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't mean to sound like I belittle the classics or their authors' achievements - I really don't. And yes, the OP does sound narrow-minded. I just dislike the attitude I tend to encounter a lot in the Lit. department that you can only find depth and greatness in old books.

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say Harriet Beecher Stowe and Uncle Tom's Cabin are particularly obscure. Maybe in the overall literary canon, okay, but historically? Not so much.

Otherwise, I completely agree.

[identity profile] falco-999.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep, sorry. Mea culpa. I picked the wrong word, and in any case didn't want to overload the sentence by sticking in a digression about Uncle Tom's Cabin as a sociological/historical document and as a work of literature.