Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-07-16 06:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3116 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3116 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Fire Emblem: Fates]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Rebecca Black, Friday]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #445.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 12:33 am (UTC)(link)Two, I think there's a strong argument to be made that there was more than enough evidence here before Goldberg had made her statement.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 03:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 03:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 06:12 am (UTC)(link)But the reason we have a legal system is so that both sides can present their evidence.
That body of evidence, while compelling, was only complied on the "He is guilty" side. However overwhelming that may be there is always the possibility of another shoe dropping, and a responsible person should wait for trial before deciding they have all the evidence they need to make a decision.
Look at it this way, if you knew nothing about the case, and you were watching doctored footage of a trial, showing only the defence side, you would then have a "substantial body of evidence" wouldn't you? would you declare him innocent?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 06:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 06:53 am (UTC)(link)More that capable? Yes! Advisable for him to do so? Oh my word no. No, in the court of public opinion, the best thing you can do is say "No comment" and leave it at that. even saying "I didn't do it" would get you a guilty verdict in TCoPO
Also,
He has, in fact, tried to do so several times
This right here is the PERFECT explanation of why TCoPO is a bad system to rely on. Because this is the first time I have ever heard of him trying to mount any defence on the matter. I have however heard it said "He didn't respond to accusations" "OMG that means he's totally guilty"
If you're trying to convince me he's guilty, save your keypresses, I already am. I am trying to highlight why people should not rely on TCoPO to render verdict.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 08:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)