[ SECRET POST #3118 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3118 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #446.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (posted 3 times) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[insanenoodlyguy]

You clearly were in very select parts of reddit then.

I mean fuck, the ex-CEO started cutting whole sections for a reason.

[(Anonymous)]

Has she bailed now? I can't say I am surprised.

[(Anonymous)]

She was let go for 'vision differences', about two weeks ago.

[(Anonymous)]

No, the misogynists drove her out.

[(Anonymous)]

She tried to put an ad based platform on top of the existing structure which was unpopular, and then she was involved in letting go a female talent coordinator who was universally adored. (From what I read.) There was a fair amount of vitrol, granted, but she was let go for her lack of understanding of the business she was charged with operating.

[feotakahari]

Funny thing about the latter part: after Pao left, her boss quietly admitted responsibility for firing the coordinator. Then the chief engineer quit and said she thought Pao was set up as a scapegoat. Now folks are mad at the boss.

[insanenoodlyguy]

She was trolled pretty hard too though. I mean, I don't think it's that simple, she did do some things I disagree with that had nothing to do with deleting things like that pro-rape board, but that was a very noticeable part of it.

That platform was fucking awful looking though. All those signatures weren't misogynists either.

[(Anonymous)]

I think it was a little of A and B. People had legitimate complaints, but misogyny/racism fueled the fire for it to get as bad as it did. I think if she were a dude people would have disagreed with her, but there wouldn't have been such a dogpiling ragefest. It was really blown out of proportion to what she did as CEO.