[ SECRET POST #3118 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3118 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #446.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (posted 3 times) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[feotakahari]

Rule of thumb: when a topic is contentious, only read the posts by named users.

Additional rule of thumb: skip any thread that consists of an anon and a named user posting back and forth at each other. Especially if the named user is Dethtoll. (I don't mean any insult to him; he just doesn't seem to have a point where he figures "This idiot isn't even worth responding to.")

[elaminator]

when a topic is contentious, only read the posts by named users.

There are certainly named users with controversial opinions (that don't mind arguing about those opinions), and there are certainly anons that don't get drawn into it. Rule of thumb isn't supposed to be 100% accurate so...maybe that makes sense, but idk.

[feotakahari]

I can only think of one case offhand where a named user got into a massive argument with another named user. Typically, they pick fights with anons.

[elaminator]

Ah, if we're talking about named users arguing (with each other) that's a bit rarer, yes. There are certainly people who don't see eye to eye on subjects but there's not usually (usually being the key word) as much sharp language thrown around. (Probably partially because they can be held responsible for it, lol.)

But there are plenty of nice anons, too! (Is the point I wanted to get across.) I've had just as many friendly convos with anons as named users. (Granted, most of those didn't take place in contentious topic threads, but I often skip those anyway.)

[herpymcderp]

This is true about 90% of the time, but I've gotten into more or less friendly "fights" with a few other named users here on a consistent basis. It wasn't serious on my end, but in a few cases I think the other named users were actually pissed with me.

And fair enough. I know I tend to offend people.

[caerbannog]

But most of the anons are nice and have quite interesting back-and-forth conversations!

[(Anonymous)]

and not infrequently, Dethtoll is an idiot. However, I agree that attempting to disagree with Dethtoll makes one an idiot: it's like getting down in the mud to wrestle a pig.