[ SECRET POST #3118 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3118 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #446.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (posted 3 times) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When gay characters die...

[(Anonymous)]

The problem that I have with this argument is that, if you look at the sum totality of Western media, it's just clearly not the case that characters dying or getting a tragic ending means that the characters are bad or going to hell. Or is Shakespeare telling us, in Hamlet, that all Danes will burn in hell?

I don't think it would be useful in any way to cut off gay characters from the vast range of stories that have tragic endings. I think there should be more happy endings. But that doesn't mean sad endings are bad.

Re: When gay characters die...

[(Anonymous)]

Hamlet is one story. If there was a history of Danes only ever being written into stories if they died tragically, typically as a result - explicit or implicit - of being Danish, you might have a valid comparison.