[ SECRET POST #3127 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3127 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

For me it depends entirely on the writing. One thing I can't stand about hero types is when they're hypocritical or shady and they DON'T get called on it, or even worse, get rewarded for it. I don't like when writers attempt to make a hero "perfect" because it makes their flaws all the more obvious.

But if a writer acknowledges the flaws and has the hero get called out sometimes, then I am all for it.

The benefit of liking a villain is that you can just enjoy them for what they are, they don't need to stand up to any test of morality because they are a villain. Some writers really do make their villains more complex and interesting as well.

So I like that fandom appreciates villains, it's always weird to me when I come across someone who questions WHY I like villains. Like some people can't understand that liking something in FICTION does not mean you like it in reality.