[ SECRET POST #3127 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3127 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sarillia]

I know nothing about this case but it bugs me that people are always saying "it's not misogyny (or whatever other prejudice), its [sensible explanation, a different prejudice, etc]". Why can't it be a little of each? Something like this is going to be more complex than just having a single cause you can point to. And when you have a lot of people all saying the same basic thing, why assume they all have the same thought process behind it?