[ SECRET POST #3129 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

Asexual or demisexual Jack Harkness.

I swear, there's threads and threads devoted to this hysterical idea.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

....

....

Asexual Jack Harkness?!!

Oh good grief, people don't actually watch the shows when they actually come up with these headcanons, do they?

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

You're joking, right? Please tell me you're joking.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

Look at asexualfanfiction.tumblr.com/directory .
Jack Harkness is the first character listed in the Doctor Who section.

( I'm not reading this stuff, 'cause I just might want to be coherent and non giggly for the next few hours. )