fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3143 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3143 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Star Trek Into Darkness is better than Star Trek 2009, although both are kind of shit

I have literally no idea what aesthetic position you could even use to reach that conclusion

Kirk is an asshole in the first movie and is rewarded for it -- the second film is basically him getting called out on his shit

Although the perving on Carol sucked, I still don't think it's worse than the perving on Uhura + the fridging of Winona and Amanda

The "not gays" (as redlettermedia put it) got on my nerves -- Scotty makes boob jokes! McCoy mentions his wife! BECAUSE WE MUST MAKE SURE THAT THE AUDIENCE KNOWS OUR MAIN MALE CHARACTERS ARE NOT GAY (Kirk obviously has Gaila scene + the Spock/Uhura -> but McCoy and Scotty were fucking pushing it)

Vulcan's destruction was awful and does nothing

As bad as the villains were in STID, they at least weren't as utterly forgettable as Nero

SOOOOO much Star Wars ripping-off in the first film (Pike = Obi-Wan, Alderaan = Vulcan, Kirk = Luke's position with Han's character, MUST LIVE UP TO FATHER'S LEGACY)

Kirk being made Captain = WTF Is this bullshit

The characters being at each other's throats the ENTIRE film almost -- in STID, they at least helped each other out more often

Okay, I guess considering a movie good or not based on whether or not you think its characters, actions, and jokes are morally justified is an aesthetic position, fair enough

It seems like a silly aesthetic position but it is an aesthetic position

[ SECRET POST #3143 ]

Re: Unpopular or Controversial Fandom Opinions

Re: Unpopular or Controversial Fandom Opinions

Re: Unpopular or Controversial Fandom Opinions

Re: Unpopular or Controversial Fandom Opinions