Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-12 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3143 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3143 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Asexuality, demisexuality, etc
I always thought that was part of diverse sexualities. I didn't come out on the premise that bi meant a limited set of partners or relationship preferences. And I'm not fond of having those preferences boosted to the level of an essentialist category.
Re: Asexuality, demisexuality, etc
(Anonymous) 2015-08-13 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)When people are having more in-depth discussions about sexuality, I think it could make sense to use some of those terms, but in general I agree with you. I think just straight, gay, bi/pansexual, and asexual are good enough in most cases, because not all people of whatever orientation are going to have the same preferences or types of relationships so it's not really necessary to be super specific.