Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-13 06:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #3144 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3144 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Grace Kelly, Judy Garland]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

[Soragumi, Shizuki Asato]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-14 06:00 am (UTC)(link)Or do you mean context as in, "this trope wouldn't be annoying / no one would complain about this if it weren't for the fact that it's gendered" similar to "damsel in distress" or "fanservice" tropes? I agree, sometimes analyses forget that and are like, "OMG, his mom died! Fridging! (Who cares if his dad also died)" or "I can't like this film because the female character had to be saved at some point." It's easy to get lost in the details and forget the bigger implication (there are few female characters, and they're all plot devices).