Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-15 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3146 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3146 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Transcript by OP
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)I believe in inclusivity and in promoting awareness of systemic and internalized biased. I think those biases are unfair and frequently harmful, and I will be very happy to see more PoCs and other marginalized groups represented in popular media in the future. But I also believe that creators, as individuals, don't have a responsibility to shape their stories for the sake of inclusivity. If the story you have in your head has four white, straight, able-bodied male leads at its center, that does not, in and of itself, make your story sexist, racist, homophobic, ablist, cissexist or any other -ist you can think of. And as a creator, you shouldn't have to worry about being branded as any one of those thing simply because you didn't go out of your way to make sure your story accommodates people's social justice agendas. (Now if your story is overtly racist, that's another matter, but that's not what we're talking about here.)
Furthermore, fandom's outlooks can be a bit unbalanced and weird. For example, it's okay to write about a terribly thing like underage rape as if it were sexy, but it's not okay to write about a CoC unless you represent them with perfect accuracy and cultural sensitivity. Because accidentally misrepresenting a CoC with one minor reference to a cultural stereotype is gross and harmful, but deliberately misrepresenting rape with a long, graphic depiction of how "hot" it is is...subversive and empowering???
Which is all to say that I get why someone might be annoyed enough to whine about the aggressive and intimidating behaviors and attitudes of the more militant SJWs. In the name of everyone's right to be heard and respected (a great cause), they end up curbing or downright quashing a lot of important voices and conversations.
Re: Transcript by OP
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Transcript by OP
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Transcript by OP
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)