Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-15 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3146 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3146 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Second, I find the idea of someone specifically pointing out a particular writer when complaining about people writing pairings they don't like (or not writing ones they do like) to be a bit questionable. It comes across as "This person is bad because they like what I don't like".
Third, the part that gets me is that your reviewer was very two-faced in their attitude. I don't blame you for feeling a bit sour when you found out how false their nice review was.
Fourth, are you still writing pairings you like? If so, keep on avoiding her skeevy questionable pairing (yes I saw the mention of it being underage).
I understand why you posted this here though, if you ever admitted you deliberately avoid her pairing to annoy her, the criticism you would get would be a whole lot worse than anything in this comment thread. I would advise not letting that be known un-anon.