Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-15 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3146 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3146 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)(I know you realize this, which is why it's a secret, but geez, Y R U SO MEAN?)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 20:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 20:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 20:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 01:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 21:49 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)It's sounding like a double standard: the author-anon can write whatever stories they want, but the commentor isn't allowed to express opinions in their own blog without being considered unreasonable? Um, no?
DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 20:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 20:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 21:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 21:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 21:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 04:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 22:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 04:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 08:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 15:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 07:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)But I guess acknowledging that would mean you wouldnt be able to show off your ability to give nonverbal "fuck you"s.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:52 (UTC) - ExpandYou're a peach!
(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)SA _ I am sorry, I think you are right to do it
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-15 23:31 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 12:49 am (UTC)(link)But from the details they gave it sounds like this was a pairing they weren't going to write ANYWAY.
All the talk of "well they're doing it to hurt/upset someone"? I could take it more seriously if they were doing something more than simply not writing a pairing they didn't seem to like or feel comfortable writing in the first place.
The complainer sounds kind of unreasonable to be complaining about how OP is wrong to not see the ship*. If someone doesn't like a ship they don't like a ship.
*If you're wondering where I got that, see OP's explanation/details.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 12:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 01:08 am (UTC)(link)i'm always on the side of fandom where a bunch of lil shits like to tell me i'm not shipping the right thing
no subject
no subject
By all means write whatever you want, but I'm not seeing the issue here. They liked your writing, on their blog they wished you would write their OTP but didn't actually go up and demand it of you?
Chill.
no subject
Second, I find the idea of someone specifically pointing out a particular writer when complaining about people writing pairings they don't like (or not writing ones they do like) to be a bit questionable. It comes across as "This person is bad because they like what I don't like".
Third, the part that gets me is that your reviewer was very two-faced in their attitude. I don't blame you for feeling a bit sour when you found out how false their nice review was.
Fourth, are you still writing pairings you like? If so, keep on avoiding her skeevy questionable pairing (yes I saw the mention of it being underage).
I understand why you posted this here though, if you ever admitted you deliberately avoid her pairing to annoy her, the criticism you would get would be a whole lot worse than anything in this comment thread. I would advise not letting that be known un-anon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 05:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 07:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)But it's okay to dream, isn't it?
(Anonymous) 2015-08-17 04:45 am (UTC)(link)I've read some fics I've loved, and in my own blog/Tumblr/whatever, mourned that a writer isn't doing my OTP. It's not out of contempt for that writer, just wishful thinking, two brilliant things coming together (Like: I wish Del Toro did Transformers).
If I'd really harrassed them for the pairing fic it would be a different. But yeah, kinda douchey, the response.