[ SECRET POST #3150 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3150 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: In the News

[(Anonymous)]

For who? Pedophiles or people with autism?

Re: In the News

[(Anonymous)]

Pedophiles with autism.

Re: In the News

[(Anonymous)]

I suspect you're a new anon, but let's continue the conversation anyway. They should not be allowed unrestricted internet access.

Re: In the News

[(Anonymous)]

How exactly? Obviously blockers aren't effective and blocking it outright is near impossible, if not a huge disadvantage when so much of our world is digitally geared. Only thing I can think of is monitoring, but that'll only catch it after that act has happened.

Re: In the News

[(Anonymous)]

Well, that's what I mean. Obviously we can't screen people for this before they show the inclination, so unfortunately there still has to be an incident. What I'm saying is there shouldn't be more than one incident. If the act is carried out by someone who genuinely doesn't understand the consequences of their actions, that person needs to be monitored and not allowed the freedom to become a repeat offender.