Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-22 04:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #3153 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3153 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #451.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)Mine below (also as examples in case this isn't clear.)
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)- I'm not sure if this was actually how it turned out, but remember how Amazon ended up supposedly censoring gay literature years ago, and everyone got upset? IIRC they realized it probably really was a glitch because a lot of other books were censored/removed as well, and the issue was more bad PR because the person who responded to the initial query used a form letter of sorts. I think that's what everyone surmised once it blew over.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-24 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-23 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Amy Schumer's got a much better claim on being a rapist, but we've all decided we like her and we don't like Lena, so whatever Lena's done is bad and whatever Amy's done is fine.
If this sounds like junior high school to you, you're not alone.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-23 01:21 am (UTC)(link)Although I have convinced myself that Amy Schumer was joking with that story, for the sake of my sanity. But she still told an absolutely execrable rape joke.
But people decided they don't like Dunham's humor or aesthetic or politics or something, so.
It's just such an insincere thing.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-24 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)And honestly, I love the movie, but that controversy seemed more like viral marketing to me.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
It probably wasn't a manosphere-wide phenomenon though.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
The novel discovery that an old coworker on FB is one
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Also the lady who said the same thing but about being black.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Not top.
TIP.
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-24 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-22 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-23 04:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-23 08:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't
(Anonymous) 2015-08-23 08:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: Internet "Scandals" That Weren't