case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-25 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #3156 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3156 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Spider Riders]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Shameless]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Mighty Boosh]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Glitch]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Fire Emblem: Awakening]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Kaikisen]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Kingdom Hearts 2]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Yu-Gi-Oh]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 029 secrets from Secret Submission Post #451.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I hate that "moral obligations" thread above. It's predicated on a black-and-white, all-good/all-bad world that doesn't fucking exist.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you're making it more black and white than it's intended to be. There are several threads where 'moral obligations' or what people feel are obligations are understood to be subjective just like the idea of 'good/bad'.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, yeah, some of the comments are okay, but the initial post itself and responses TO those people (presumably from the OP) paint a different pictures. Basically, I hate that it exists. Which is ridiculous, I know.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1270528.html?thread=857752832#cmt857752832

This is presumably from OP and the exact opposite of what you're saying though...

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
A bunch of the answers there are saying "it's complicated" though

(also you can have black-and-white principles while also acknowledging and dealing with a world that is grey and full of things that are both good and bad) (that's kind of the entire purpose of moral judgment)

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Meh. Most of the GC threads are. I think b/c they're nor meant to be serious/generate an essay in every comment.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
*not

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2015-08-25 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, as the starter of the thread above, you're reading a bunch into it that wasn't there. "I think this is a moral obligation," "I don't think this is one," and "my moral system can't determine without more information" or "I don't believe in or have moral systems" would all have been fine and valid answers? I was asking people's opinions according to them, not trying to judge people one way or the other. If you notice I haven't sided with anyone and my one question was mainly whether one anon thought not being a dick was a moral obligation or not, and it turned out they didn't, so that explained what they said.

I understand people who shout about morals and try to pressure them on people are everywhere and obnoxious dicks and I hate them too, but asking whether you would consider something moral or not is not nearly the same thing. I get the feeling you're judging me for bringing up the idea of morals before reading anything I say. :\