Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-01 07:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #3163 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3163 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #452.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Then again, it might not necessarily alter it in a bad way...
But, yeah, I feel like it really fits in that case! Also, I think I agree with you, in that a little bit of each is nice. Depending on the tone of a game, one approach could work better than the other, anyway.
no subject
Yup, not every game would suit player-sexual NPC's but some would without affecting the rest of the game, it'd be a case-by-case things rather than a 'apply it to everything!' situation.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-02 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
That is true, though, that you could choose to keep most relationships strictly platonic, in the same way that you can choose to keep most of the actual LI options platonic. So, I guess the potential for an altered dynamic is there, rather than it being a foregone thing.
Still, I do personally like being limited in that way, and think it works for the series, even if my initial reasoning doesn't quite pan out.