case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-04 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3166 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3166 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Angels With Dirty Faces]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Tomorrowland]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for dubcon]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for pedophilia]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #452.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Do you think sexual orientation is 100% genetic?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-04 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah and I think it's pretty evident that it can be fairly fluid throughout a life time too. I kinda hate how often environmental factors and societal expectations are ignored in these types of conversations. I don't think you can pray the gay away or anything, but I do think hanging around other gay/bi people might make people more likely to identify as such.

Re: Do you think sexual orientation is 100% genetic?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-04 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I think if more people were open to the idea, we'd have more people who identify as very hetero-leaning bi or very gay-leaning bi.

A lot of 'technically' bi people ID in name as 100% straight or gay or lesbian due to societal factors and pressure from both sides to be 100% one or the other.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Do you think sexual orientation is 100% genetic?

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-09-05 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
I think the idea of it being all genetic came from reactions against people saying it was a choice or that it was social and therefore should be changed. But I think there is too much fear of saying it is partially social just as anything about a person because being social doesn't make it wrong or mean it should be forcibly changed (or that it can be).