Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-10 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3172 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3172 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

(Ollie Locke)
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Forever]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Doctor Who]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Do these people sound like annoying hipsters, or what?
I mean, I like many older clothing styles. And I think it's kind of cool that they use old technology. But really, wanting to actually LIVE in the Victorian era? No vaccines, lynching and lack of rights for black people (in the US, where this couple live), no female suffrage, high child mortality... sheesh.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)What's up with all the reactionary oddballs ranting on the internet about how life was better without modern technology lately?
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Massively privileged people who have no idea what it's like to be FORCED to go without, coupled with too much time on their hands.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 12:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
A lot of people take a very romantic view of the Victorian era, largely due to the clothing and manners and, to a lesser extent, the dancing; it all seems so elegant and refined. But the larger reality of the period was...pretty harsh.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
My dad told me the other day one of my ancestors in the Victorian era died being operated on on his kitchen table for a relatively minor complaint, which is a thing that was done. Such a prosaic end. Wouldn't revisit that time for quids.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
And yeah, there's definitely a classist element. It wasn't so elegant for the people who belonged to the lower classes, and who typically couldn't hope to ever climb higher.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Just saying...
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 01:02 am (UTC)(link)I'm not saying this is the same thing, I'm just saying (as a response to some of the other comments in this thread) not all Victorian enthusiasts are upper class snobs who miss the days of white supremacy. They also are fully aware that as women, they would've been way worse off.
Re: Just saying...
On the plus side, the people I know aren't so much lamenting the loss of racial and class supremacy as they're unaware of a lot of the problems of the era, and don't really want to think or learn about them.
Re: Just saying...
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 01:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Just saying...
Re: Just saying...
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-11 02:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Just saying...
Re: Just saying...
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-11 02:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Just saying...
Re: Just saying...
Re: Just saying...
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-11 02:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 04:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Not to mention hot showers and fresh fruit in winter and Nyquil.)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
I think it's fascinating what they can learn by going through at least half of the motions of living through that time, even if not all of it is 100% accurate. She talks about how it began with a love of the clothing, and grew from there. So isn't it a transformative process? Isn't it very personal to them? I don't know that I'd call it hipster because they aren't telling other people what to do, and they get enough hate. There are other people who live like this too, and are very happy. Who cares if it's just 72% accurate, it's not like they're trying to make Victorian of the year or something.
This is like cosplayer elitsm or something, like if you aren't a good fan of something and don't wear every last accessory, you did it wrong...
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)But otherwise, I tend to agree with you. Yes, she's chosen a slower lifestyle that requires a substantial commitment in time and (at least up front; I don't know about the long run) money. Some of the posters on this thread have labeled this the act of someone who's "massively privileged and with too much time on her hands." But the same could also be said of the rather sizable fraction of fandom people who spend 20 to 40 hours a week on TV, social media, gaming and fic. But just imagine the tremendous howl of outrage that would go up to heaven if you did! People are massively hypocritical about stuff like this: "HVDU judge me for how I spend my discretionary time and money...but I'm going to side-eye the fuck out of the way this other person spends their discretionary time and money!"
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
But yeah, I prefer the live-and-let-live approach to hobbies. If no one's forcing their hobby on me, who the hell cares what they do for their own? She seems really happy doing it. It's her passion, it doesn't matter how accurate or not it is.
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) 2015-09-12 12:04 am (UTC)(link)Less criticizing her for not being authentic enough, than calling her on what they perceive as hypocrisy: "So you want to live in the past? You think it was better back then? Okay, missy, no antibiotics, tetanus shots, tampons, high-tech emergency medical interventions, or voting for you! How do you like your bygone era now?"
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-12 02:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
Re: Oh, seriously (neo-victorian hipsters)
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-12 05:24 (UTC) - Expand