case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-13 03:27 pm

[ SECRET POST #3175 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3175 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Let me show you something.

"sanc·ti·mo·ni·ous
ˌsaNG(k)təˈmōnēəs/Submit
adjectivederogatory
making a show of being morally superior to other people."

Part of the definition of sanctimonius is that they're making a SHOW of it. That they're rubbing it in other's faces and bragging about it.

If you have to inquire about someone's choice not to use swearwords than by definition it is not sanctimonious.

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Ye-es. And in general, if I'm inquiring about it, that means I noticed, which means there was likely a show of some kind. I wouldn't go inquire to your friends because I have no idea who they are, but someone would have to do quite a bit to make me notice the fact that they actively censor themselves from swearing at all times. I say this as someone who rarely, rarely swears-- it's not that noticeable and certainly not to the "at all" extent.

Censoring themselves in a professional setting and such is obviously different, that's the outside rules again.

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
You talked about non sanctimonious reasons. What I'm saying is that if you have to inquire the REASON then how the fuck is the reason "sanctimonious"?

and really, why do people have to justify to what words they do or don't use to begin with? Oh no they've avoided using swear words 10 times now!

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh? "A sanctimonious reason" isn't "the reason is explicitly to be sanctimonious". It's a reason that incidentally comes off sanctimonious. Like a hypocritical reason isn't "in order to be a hypocrite", it's a reason that incidentally comes off hypocritical.

I never said people have to justify what words they use.

I think you're getting confused now, because this is starting to not make sense.

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

(Anonymous) 2015-09-14 08:01 am (UTC)(link)
non of all ayrt,

why so f***ing serious?