[ SECRET POST #3177 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12. http://i57.tinypic.com/35chf9c.jpg
[penis]


__________________________________________________



13. http://i.imgur.com/OB1EeH5.jpg
[porn - furry/illustrated]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Any female Republicans here?

[(Anonymous)]

Some women are anti-abortion and think women's bodies SHOULD be policed to save babies and will support candidates who share their views regardless of gender.

I mean, it's not a difficult concept.

Re: Any female Republicans here?

[(Anonymous)]

^^^This is the shit that pisses me off. The mother abandons the baby. Dies as a result of a complicated delivery. Isn't financially able to care for a child. Child has severe medical condition. Whatever. Are the conservatives going to adopt all these babies they saved? Support them financially? Ensure they live well and grow? No? Then fucking let women abort.

I mean, it's not a difficult concept.

Re: Any female Republicans here?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not Republican, but I'm female and pro-life and... yes, I suppose that's basically it. Though the "policing women's bodies" language always irritates me - I don't give a single fuck what other women do with their bodies so long as it doesn't result in the end of a life. (For what it's worth I feel the same way about the PRO-CHOICERS WANT TO KILL BABIES!!! side of the pro-life movement. No they don't, idiots. We just have different perspectives about fetuses.)

ON THE OTHER HAND while I wouldn't discount all pro-life men out of hand, a lot of male pro-life politicians say incredibly disgusting things I don't want to be associated with and I've come to be pretty skeptical of candidates who are vocally pro-life. That and disagreeing with them on... most everything else. So I guess the pro-life non-Republican thing isn't working out too great for me.

Re: Any female Republicans here?

[ariakas]

This was the stance I held back in ye olden days when I was still pro-life. I think both sides have a lot of misconceptions about the other: there were definitely people in my church who held the view that anyone pro-choice was an irresponsible, baby-killing slut, they never actually talked to anyone who was pro-choice. I did, and found that, being pro-life (because I saw it as killing, no other reason, and wholeheartedly supported adoption/welfare programs to help mothers with unwanted children) many of them saw me as a woman-hating redneck.

Of course I later realized that I don't support forced organ donations even if the recipient will die without one and the donor most likely won't (i.e. liver tissue, kidneys), and effectively forcing women to donate their bodily tissues to another person against their will made me an absolute hypocrite and became pro-choice, but that's another story.