Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-18 06:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #3180 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3180 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for domestic violence/abuse]

[The Musketeers]
__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape]

[Babylon 5]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 02:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:00 am (UTC)(link)But I also find it hard to imagine that someone could consider Dorian their favorite character while failing to pick up on the potential implications of modding him into liking their female inquisitor, when he explains in-game that his father tried to mage away the gay.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:17 am (UTC)(link)Sry, bi!Dorian can still fit that bill cause he'd still be interested in men, just that he can also like women.
I just find the outcry over those particular mods to be over the top. Because, honestly, we have more representation of homosexual relationships in media (how quality they are tends to be a rollercoaster) than we do of bisexual relationships. I mean, I see the criticisms all the time about bi erasure, on both sides of the fence.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:40 am (UTC)(link)Why would his dad need to brainwash him into be attracted to women if he was bi? It's an important plot point that he's gay.
It's ridiculous and disingenuous to claim that you're giving gay characters opposite gender attraction in the name of bi representation. Bi people and gay people are both underrepresented in the media. Trying to get more representation by stealing from each other is counterproductive and oftentimes offensive.
Besides, claiming that you're only changing gay characters to bolster bi representation is doubly ridiculous in this specific scenario, considering that Dorian and Sera are the only gay love interests available across all three games. All of the other non-straight love interests (of which there are 8) are bi/pan. The simple existence of two gay characters is not bi erasure.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)Nooooot that hard a thing to think of.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)It's wildly inappropriate to claim that the conflict works just as well if Dorian is bi. He isn't and it doesn't. So much of his storyline makes no sense at all if it's reduced to a simple case of him wanting to escape an arranged marriage, and it seems insensitive besides, because the person who wrote him is a gay man whose experiences heavily influenced Dorian's. And it's especially inappropriate considering that you've never actually played the game.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 04:00 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, I can understand both sides of the argument. It's easy for me to view romance mods more on the same level as self-insert fanfics than anything. At the end of the day they can't change canon and they're only meant for someone's personal pleasure rather than to make a statement, so I think people have the right to use them.
Saying that, I actually do agree that changing Dorian's sexuality comes across as skeevier than the other mods considering his past! But like I said, I don't think most of them do it to intentionally to erase gay characters, just to make playing easier for themselves.
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:12 am (UTC)(link)Take SWTOR as an example. I like the smuggler story and if I decide to make a male!Smugg to romance Risha, and really like that romance, if I could and not get in throuble for it? I'd totally make a mod so my fem!Smugg could romance her. And if our companions were able to he exclusively gay, I'd probably do the same thing to see what it'd be like with a het pair for them.
It has nothing to do with erasure. It's just me wanting to experiment and see how they play out. More times than not, in the end, the natural romance (i.e. what was programed from the get go) feels the best (though in the case of Corso, no romance is worth it with him imo), but I see nothing wrong with different headcanons and the like for a new playthrough.
I imagine Dragon Age would be the same, in the end.
The ONLY people I would side eye, but still defend in playing their game, are the ones who buy the game and immediately look for those mods without giving the in game romances a try first.
-otakugal15
(one of these days i will finally change my password so i can log back in from my phone)
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 03:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)-otakugal15
Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mods in Dragon Age fandom
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 04:06 am (UTC)(link)