Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-21 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3183 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3183 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:03 am (UTC)(link)Look, I cringe at JKR's awkward attempts to write romance as much as the next HP fan, but that "explanation" is ridiculous and says a lot more about the fans who believe it than it does about the characters involved.
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:06 am (UTC)(link)I don't see it as an Oedipus complex but it does bother me how both Lily and Ginny seem to be put on a pedestal. James most certainly is not on one but Lily definitely is.
I really liked Ginny in Book 5.
But by book 6 it seemed like JKR was constantly going on and on about how smart and talented and popular and good-looking Ginny was and what a good Quidditch player she is too.
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:13 am (UTC)(link)I'd argue James actually was put on a pedestal up until Harry found out about his teenage acts of dickishness. It makes sense for Harry to idolize his parents to an extent since all the adults he knows constantly talk them up as the Greatest People Ever, and having never met them, it would be comforting for him to imagine them being the Greatest People Ever. Harry gets a rude awakening when Snape's memory contradicts what he'd been led to believe about James, thus pushing James off the pedestal he'd been put on. Harry has no such rude awakening regarding Lily, who for all we know could have also done dickish things when she was a teenager that Harry (and by extension, the readers) never found out about.
As for Ginny being put on a pedestal, I suspect that has more to do with JKR being overly fond of her than anything else. (There's a phenomenon TV Tropes calls the "Creator's Pet", formerly known as "The Wesley" after Wesley Crusher from Star Trek TNG. I think Ginny is a good example of this trope.)
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:17 am (UTC)(link)But given that Lily stays on her pedestal and that Harry also seems to build one for Ginny, that combined with similarities in their appearances can't help but to have me be reminded of Lily whenever Harry talks about Ginny.
I do think Ginny is an odd character though -- she seems to have been created specifically as a reward for Harry. The only girl in the Weasley family so that Harry could officially become part of their family. And she's beautiful, intelligent, spunky, great at Quidditch, etc.
I just miss Book 5 Ginny. A lot of people found the transition jarring but I liked it. Ginny had grown up but hadn't been put on the pedestal yet.
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:23 am (UTC)(link)I can understand why you'd find Ginny's treatment in the narrative reminiscent of Lily's (they are both definitely idealized characters), but nothing will convince me that any similarities between the two of them are sufficient evidence to claim that Harry canonically has an Oedipus complex.
I do agree that Book 5 Ginny is the best Ginny, though!
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:13 am (UTC)(link)But honestly, for Ginny, she's being seen through Harry's eyes, so there's a "Harry filter" there. Plenty of other characters also disagree with or dis her, and even in book 6 we've seen how Ginny herself can get downright nasty.
I like Ginny having plenty of friendships and boyfriends other than Harry. To me it just showed that she had a life outside of Harry.
I guess I just feel like it's an overreaction /reminiscent of the whole 'Mary Sue suspicion. Ginny grew up in a family full of brothers, and a family that was very into Qudditch, many of her brothers were Quddicth players, and to me Ginny always seemed like the kind of girl who wanted to go out and play with the boys, while her mother tended to overprotect her for being the only daughter. So....her being good at Quidditch isn't surprising.
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)I'm sure she had faults, but they were unlikely to come to light. And of course Harry wasn't going to go specifically looking for them.
Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Interpretations on Canon that you just don't get
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Besides, Ginny is obviously a substitute for Ron.
:duck and run: