[ SECRET POST #3185 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3185 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 025 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[raspberryrain]

Yeah, I know what you mean! Of course, lots of artists are formulaic about a lot more than that. So generic pubes are OK in that context. Having no pubes just looks weird for a lot of characters though.

. . .

I don't do fanart as a rule, but I do think about this kind of stuff in character design. Not pubes as much as some other things, but I try to design characters with different body parts. It's probably a bigger deal to me because I work in a 3D medium, so I'll have reference files saved of the "official" version of a character, and sometimes I'll have little details like that saved that might never be seen. It can be part of sculpting a unique character. (Not as much for certain unsexy background characters!)

. . .

In fanart, I think it would have to depend on how much I want to presume about the character. I might just keep them in pants. But yeah, when it comes up, you have to just make a judgement call.

[(Anonymous)]

Generic Pubes is my band name now.